Skip to main content

Narcissism: ‘Selfish,’ by Kim Kardashian West, and More [3 Book...



Narcissism: ‘Selfish,’ by Kim Kardashian West, and More [3 Book Reviews with comment]

By Caitlin Flanagan Illustration by Quentin Vijoux Appeared in the NY Times [http://nyti.ms/1O2Sgbx]

[excerpted, edited, formatted, and headers, mine: RIW. It’s always easy to take a potshot at a current cultural icon. My hope is that by presenting this article attention might be drawn toward promoting a more reflective and helpful conversation about narcissism in particular and sociopathy in general. My apologies for using Ms. Kardashian as an example.]

SELFISH by Kim Kardashian West. Illustrated. 445 pp. Rizzoli. $19.95. THE NARCISSIST YOU KNOW: Defending Yourself Against Extreme Narcissists in an All-About-Me Age by Joseph Burgo. 261 pp. Touchstone. $25. RETHINKING NARCISSISM: The Bad — and Surprising Good — About Feeling Special by Craig Malkin. 240 pp. Harper Wave. $25.99.

Kim Kardashian and narcissism: is it sociopathy?

During her reign, Kim Kardashian has proved herself to be a person of towering if brittle self-regard. The brittleness is revealed in the floods of tears that attend even minor affronts to her sense of self: if a family member gently teases her; if she feels in any way misunderstood; if she realizes she may give birth to her third fiancé’s child before her second divorce is final. But the true nature of her self-­regard — river deep and mountain high — is revealed in just about all of her other actions, and particularly in her recently published collection of self-portraits, “Selfish.”

As a physical object, the book is surprisingly elegant: a compact white bible, a thing beckoning to be held. The suggested interpretation of its cover photo — exquisite little head perched atop exquisite massive breasts — is implied by the resonant word that sits beneath it: Rizzoli. This is the post-Calabasas Kim, the Kanye West Kim, the Kim who must be deferred to by the world’s greatest photographers and designers. But it’s still our Kim, taking picture after picture of herself in full makeup or full monte, sticking out her tongue or her naked bottom, the mysteries of her arresting beauty undercut, as ever, by her own inane commentary: “I had one drink and was wasted LOL. Rachel and I met up with friends at a random bar in New York.”

Kardashian wants us to know that she is leading a beautiful life, that it is peopled by beautiful friends, all of whom reflect or enhance her own beauty, but the question for you and me is:

Are we in any kind of danger here?

Is Kardashian a threat to us?

Or should we look to her, instead, as exemplar, as someone with much to teach us about mastering our own selfish lives?

Opposing positions on these questions are taken by two new books: “The Narcissist You Know: Defending Yourself Against Extreme Narcissists in an All-About-Me Age,” by Joseph Burgo, and “Rethinking Narcissism: The Bad — and Surprising Good — About Feeling Special,” by Craig Malkin.

Narcissism is everywhere

Just when we had girded ourselves against the sociopath next door, Burgo alerts us to the narcissist across the street. What a neighborhood! Burgo, a psychotherapist, instructs us that 5 percent of the population consists of “extreme narcissists,” people who “fall short of the diagnostic threshold for Narcissistic Personality Disorder” but who can still make our lives hell with their whims and rants. We are informed of eight types of the species — the Bullying Narcissist, the Know-It-All Narcissist, the Self-Righteous Narcissist — and invited to apply our newfound knowledge not only to our rotten neighbors but also to our national celebrities. We might consider Kardashian’s tantrums as responses to “narcissistic injuries” — to the fact that deep shame lies underneath all grandiosity, and if that shame is activated (by losing a diamond in the Aegean or by being confronted by her chubby brother’s bitter envy), nothing can contain it.

“Narcissism is good”

Malkin, a therapist and psychology instructor at Harvard Medical School, takes a more inspirational attitude toward the subject. “Narcissism isn’t all bad,” he writes. “In fact, some narcissism is good — even vital — for us to lead happy, fulfilled and productive lives.” He writes that “creativity, leadership and high self-esteem” are associated with the feeling that one is better than average. If we began to understand narcissism as yet another spectrum disorder, we might be able to assess our own egos, and maybe even pump them up a bit. “At the heart of narcissism lies an ancient conundrum,” Malkin writes. “How much should we love ourselves, and how much should we love others?”


For Kim it’s a settled issue

For Kim Kardashian, this is settled science. Loving herself — extravagantly and in the manner of a grand romance, with fits of anger and remorse and ecstatic forgiveness — is the way to go. Who else could describe a collection of self-portraits as “a candid tribute to my fans”? Although her reach is vast, her beginnings are in reality television, a form so shallow it’s mesmerizing, and that she is talentless — the one unifying assessment of her legion of detractors — is a baseless claim. Like Martha Stewart, she represents affordability and aspiration. Yes, her Sears line of clothing folded; true, her perfume is bewilderingly described as “a tantalizing Oriental gourmand,” but she’s not about Martha Stewart-style perfection. She got started with a sex tape, she has the heartbreak of psoriasis, she’s holding nothing back.

As an “extreme narcissist: she creates around her an unrealistic dream-world

This is not granny-panty feminism; it’s shopgirl feminism. What she’s selling isn’t the dream of a Sarah Lawrence degree, a bold venture into a sustainability-related career and eventual — messy, human, rewarding — co-parenting. She’s selling the idea that any young woman scanning bar codes at Kmart can vault out of that condition not by night school and thrift but by texting enough naked selfies and staging enough tear-filled mini-dramas that she gets discovered and ends up with her own McMansion and a diamond as big as the Ritz.

Could Kim Kardashian have created and capitalized upon this improbable vision if she had worked at achieving Craig Malkin’s sweet spot of “just enough” narcissism?

Would she be the woman she is today if she had taken Joseph Burgo’s advice and severed ties to her narcissistic mother?

She "believes” she’s special, “better, and more interesting than anyone else around here”

There’s nothing cynical about Kardashian’s enterprise. What fuels everything — every product and episode and personal appearance — is the honestly held and unshakable conviction that she is special and better and more interesting than anyone else around her. That a trio of spray-tanned shoppers managed to transform themselves into the Mitford sisters of the San Fernando Valley is entirely because of Kim Kardashian — the only Kardashian most of us can reliably recognize — and her fathomless ego.

In fact, the advice about narcissism in these two new books will be of more practical use to the army of trolls who live to mock her than it might be to Kardashian herself. The hundreds of people who rushed to Amazon to trash “Selfish” — often at great and considered length, usually without having seen a copy — might take these words from Burgo to heart:

“Managing an Extreme Narcissist depends largely on mastering your own reactions to their behavior, your own defensive responses to their assaults on your self-esteem.”

It’s easy to feel better than Kim Kardashian, and it’s just as easy to sustain your own narcissistic injury by contemplating how much she has accomplished, and how little she cares about what you think of her.

via http://bit.ly/1O2Se37



via Tumblr http://bit.ly/1KDGqRh

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Presciently and timely 1994 interview with Author Walter Mosley...

Presciently and timely 1994 interview with Author Walter Mosley #racism #in America Introduction to Interview Crime novelist Walter Mosley writes out of a need to show how race may dominate people’s way of seeing life. His portrayal of the detective, Easy Rawlins expresses, in a moving and profound way, the experience of a black man living in the white world of Los Angeles during the beginning years of the second half of the 20th century. Easy, as the narrative’s protagonist, acts out of a knowing awareness of how a rigid, racially-narrow social order can rule life. He embodies a compassionate and wise understanding of convention’s unjust realities. And perhaps he also now leaves us a gift: a perceptive, reflective window through which to gaze upon our present, national tragedies of prejudice and racial hatred. Let us together hope that now and in the future we might “seek good, and not evil, that you may live; … Hate evil, and love good, And establish justice in the gate” (Amos 5:...

Tasting Reality: A Recipe for How We Judge

Come, pull up a chair, and let's explore something fascinating together.  Imagine the world as a vast buffet, overflowing with sights, sounds, smells, and sensations. It's a feast for the senses, but how do we choose what to savor? How do we decide which flavors to focus on and how to combine them into a satisfying experience? It turns out, we all have a unique recipe for tasting reality, a personal filter that shapes how we perceive and judge the world around us.  Think of it as a three-course meal for the mind: First Course: Selection -  The Art of Choosing Ingredients Just as a chef carefully selects the finest ingredients for their dish, our minds instinctively choose what to focus on.  We can't possibly pay attention to everything, so we gravitate towards the cues and signals that resonate with us. Our past experiences, our passions, our cultural background – these all influence what catches our eye and what we deem important.  A birdwatcher might notice th...

The Paradox of Boundaries: Embracing the Tension Between Order and Chaos

We are creatures of boundaries. We draw lines on maps, build fences around our homes, and categorize the world into neat, manageable boxes. Boundaries give us a sense of order, helping us navigate the complexity of our surroundings and make sense of the constant influx of information. But what happens when those boundaries become too rigid, too confining? What if, in our quest for order, we inadvertently stifle creativity, obscure vital connections, and limit our understanding of the world? This essay explores the paradoxical nature of boundaries, drawing on two contrasting perspectives. On one side of the coin, we have the view that boundaries enhance visibility and promote abstraction, allowing us to see patterns and grasp larger concepts. On the other side, we have the argument that rigid boundaries can create artificial divisions, obscure important details, and limit our ability to see things in new ways. By examining both sides of this coin, we can develop a more nuanced understan...